Sampling strategy Β· Expert agreement metrics Β· All parameters auto-determined from corpus Β· Use CSV for large files (>20 MB)
What would you like to do?
Relationship between LLM sentiment annotation and reviewer star rating. Results on the full corpus (~220k rows) are statistically robust.
Rare cells (<5% prevalence) receive a proportional bonus up to 2Γ the base quota to improve coverage of minority sentiment classes.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (two-way random, absolute agreement) on the number of positive/negative/neutral fragments per annotator pair, conditional on both annotators having the dimension active. Thresholds: <0.50 Poor Β· 0.50β0.74 Moderate Β· 0.75β0.89 Good Β· β₯0.90 Excellent (Koo & Mae, 2016).
Convergent validity check: relationship between LLM sentiment annotation and reviewer star rating. A high correlation reflects consistency between the reviewer's numeric rating and the LLM's semantic annotation β not a causal claim.
Sessions are saved on the server and can be resumed at any time. Each expert should use a unique session ID.
Export your completed annotations for use in the metrics computation module.